Angelina Jolie recently revealed that she and her children have not set foot on Château Miraval, the French winery she once shared with Brad Pitt, since the emotional events that contributed to their split. In new court documents tied to a legal battle over the winery, Jolie called her departure from that chapter of her life “sudden” and painful—and she’s made it clear she has no plans to go back.
Context: The Winery Dispute After Divorce
Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt finalized their divorce in December 2024 after years of separation and tangled legal disputes. One major point of contention remains Château Miraval, a winery the pair co-owned in France.
Pitt previously accused Jolie of selling her stake in the estate without his approval—a claim she denied. The disagreement escalated into a separate commercial lawsuit. Jolie’s recent filing in Los Angeles County Superior Court stems from her opposition to a motion Pitt filed in October 2025. In her response, she explained why revisiting Miraval is simply too difficult.
Jolie’s Statement: Why She Won’t Return
In the documents, Jolie said she chose to leave the property entirely in Pitt’s control without compensation. She wrote that she hoped such a decision would calm tensions during their legal wrangling.
“Given its connection to the painful events leading to the divorce,” Jolie stated, “the children and I have never again set foot on the property.” She also emphasized the emotional fallout:
“To have such a sudden break from my home and memories has been hard.”
She further noted that she and her children had immediately begun seeking shelter elsewhere, renting first and later searching for a permanent home. Jolie also clarified that she did not request alimony or other financial support, since much of her assets were tied up in Miraval.
Jolie’s filing also recounted the significance of the winery in her life:
“It was a focal point of our family life. We were married there, I spent part of my pregnancy there, and I brought our twin children home from the hospital.”
She added that the abrupt separation from Miraval stripped her of more than real estate—it also severed her ties to shared memories and family milestones.
(H3) Legal Battles, Emotions & Public Perception
The struggle over Miraval underscores how divorce between high-profile individuals often involves multi-layered conflict—emotional, financial, and legal. By stating she won’t return, Jolie appears to draw a firm boundary. She distinguishes that the winery dispute is a commercial matter separate from their personal bond.
Additionally, her explanation that she relinquished property control without compensation reveals strategy. She may be trying to undercut arguments that she acted in bad faith. Meanwhile, her desire for closure and psychological distance from Miraval could resonate with those who see separation as necessary for healing.
Pitt’s side has pushed back, asserting Jolie’s claims hamper discovery and hinder cooperation. Inside sources argue the fighting continues because both parties view Château Miraval as more than just property—it’s a symbol of legacy, identity, and emotional weight.
Impact & Takeaway
- Separation from the past. Jolie’s decision to never return to Miraval reflects how physical spaces can hold emotional heft.
- Legal strategies at play. Her approach illustrates how emotional appeal and factual positioning can intertwine in litigation.
- No neutral ground. Even a commercial dispute here carries personal meaning, especially when children and memories are involved.
- Healing as intentional choice. Jolie’s refusal to revisit the property signals a deep need to move forward, not linger in someone else’s domain.
In the end, Angelina Jolie’s stance goes beyond real estate or business. It’s about reclaiming autonomy over her narrative—and deciding where, and whether, she wants her story to intersect with the past.
